An interview with Shabbir Banoobhai

conducted by Rajendra Chetty

 

 

General

 

 

1.     You explore relationships extensively in your poems, especially with God and society. What is the link between your religion and your poetry? 

 

 

There is probably a very deep, all-pervasive link. I would say almost everything that I write is spiritual in some way.  It’s not something I set out to do consciously.  It’s part of my nature that shows in my writing.

 

 

2.     Is your poetry an expression of your religious commitment?

 

 

It is not an expression of my religious commitment in that sense that I am trying to create artefacts deliberately to mirror my inner self - the “spiritual” force within me naturally expresses itself in my poetry.

 

 

3.     Have the techniques of religious poetry permeated your writings? If yes, in what ways?

 

 

I can’t respond to that per se because I am not certain what is meant by the techniques of religious poetry. When I write I am not conscious that I am writing religious poetry and I am not conscious of a special technique that I am using either because it is poetry or because it is religious poetry… I am conscious of technique that is essential for making it “strong” poetry but not consciously using any special technique associated with “religious” poetry.

 

 

Rajen] Yes, for example the incantatory techniques…

 

 

The incantantory stuff, that is a technique used in religious poetry and I have used it myself in poems such as “Iqbal, it is winter here still”  - so there may well be influences I am not aware of.

 

 

Rajen] Coming back to Iqbal and the incantantory techniques, was the Qur’an the start…

 

 

The Qur’an is a very, very powerful work of guidance expressed in Arabic – it is a very moving book and you know sound is all-powerful in the Qur’an. In fact in my recent readings I have learnt that the single most decisive way of changing the inner being/ consciousness of a person is through the use of sound and the Qur’an obviously uses sound supremely well. I’ve probably been subconsciously influenced by the beauty of the Qur’an, - the Qur’an is in Arabic and powerful in its original language  - its rhythms and cadences are “special” and it is very possible there is some imbibed sound system within myself I am not conscious of.

 

 

Rajen] I’m glad that you mentioned sound, I’m glad that you’ve cleared this up now, it’s very interesting what you are saying, because I think in the reading of your poem…

 

 

That is possible, because obviously I have a spiritual link with the Qur’an but also a genetic link with other Islamic poetry, including Arabic and Urdu poetry. Strangely Douglas Livingstone picked this up a long time ago when he said that my work was subliminally ignited by what he called the ancient great Islamic poets – he went on to say further, and this is not known as well “of whose art he knew surprisingly little!”  I believe that there is a genetic link; I do think there is something in that. And obviously in my growing up I must also have been exposed to sounds and rhythms that have stayed with me.

 

 

4.     Your personal notes make reference to a few catalysts that led to your insight into social and political issues. How would you define the poet’s role within social and political struggles?

 

 

I don’t think that any one kind of person with any particular kind of ability only has responsibility for everything around him. I think we all have a responsibility and if the poet has words that he can use well then it is his special responsibility to use them well, and if the musician has music that he could use well for the same purpose then it is his responsibility to use his music well or for that matter any person who has any ability.  I think there are many kinds of ability that human beings have - all are gifts that should be used to the fullest. So to that extent that the poet is able to see things within society as a result of some inherent ability to see in a meaningful way then obviously the poet has a responsibility to comment on what he sees and to try to transform his environment and the world. 

 

 

5.     Which poet did you admire most and had the greatest influence on your writings?  I note that parallels have been drawn between your writings and T.S. Eliot, Done, Dylan Thomas and Mac Niece.

 

 

I am often asked this question, I think my honest answer to the question is I like good poetry – I cannot think of one poet that I like more than others - when I read a good poem and (good is obviously subjective, when I say good – I mean good to me) I am moved by it! There isn’t any one poet or writer that I gravitate towards.

 

 

6.     Apart from Douglas Livingstone, is there any other person who played a major role in your work as poet?

 

 

I should say this again - Douglas obviously was the major influence. What Douglas taught me that the writing of poetry was a craft.  I had always felt before I met Douglas, and I was very young then, that I had to write the poem perfectly the first time I put my thoughts down on paper and if it wasn’t “complete” then I couldn’t do much about it subsequently- that that was it! But Douglas taught me that I needed to work on my poetry, I needed to treat it as an artefact –to shape it – to own it – to polish it, and to make it strong and lasting - and that was a lesson for which I have never stopped being grateful. I was really privileged to have met Douglas and to have learnt from him. This influence has been with me all my life and can be seen in all my work – it pervades my work.    

       

The other person I think who played a pretty big role very early in my career was Mike Kirkwood. Mike was more critical of my early work than Douglas was. Douglas liked my work from the first time he saw it and Mike was almost never happy, always critical.  Perhaps it was a good thing because I had to work harder in a sense to write the publishable poem and when Mike finally agreed to publish my first book that for me was a huge, huge sign of having accomplished something worthwhile as a poet. Despite Douglas’ approval of my work, I think I might have felt more pleased (relieved?) the day Mike finally said yes than the first day I met Douglas and learnt he liked my writing.

 

 

Echoes of my other self

 

 

7.     Comment on the fact that many of the poems in “Echoes of my other self” are drawn from images of nature.

 

 

This again is not something that I was conscious of at the time of writing.   I was only made conscious of it after the book was published - you read a review and someone says there are a number of references in these poems to nature and you become conscious of it.

 

No. I probably imbibe what I see in my surroundings and this becomes part of my inner self.

 

 

8.     What was the catalyst for the long poem dedicated to the Islamic poet and philosopher, Muhamed Iqbal?

 

 

Catalyst. I was reading a lot of Iqbal at the time, and what I liked about him was that he had this huge optimism about human nature - an unquenchable thirst for development and the desire to make the world and everything around come alive. That inspired me and I looked at South Africa and I thought how essential the philosophy of Iqbal was for us and how important it was for us, and in this sense I think “us” means more specifically the South African Muslim community. It is almost the only poem I have written that is specifically addressed to the Muslim community. I was trying to say that we needed to come to alive within this country of ours so that we could actually contribute to it ourselves.

 

 

9.     How do you strike the healthy equilibrium between emotions and rationality without ranting and raving?

 

 

I would like to think its’ a gift in as much as it’s there – supplemented by reading and reflection - I am grateful it’s there – this inner balance.

 

 

10.  Are there notes of anger in parts of your first work, e.g. the repetitive hardening imagery in the poem the most I fear of heavy rain. When you look back to your first collection, do you see development, a change in your poetry and writing style?

 

 

The most I fear of heavy rain” - I think it’s a marvellous poem by the way. It’s so rich - it really says more than one can actually imagine because it says something, stops and takes you to something else but brings you back more forcefully to the subject again. So you almost never know where you’re being led but you are being led very decisively to the end – to the subject of the poem, which is the obliteration, and the removal of people from their homes and from their land. It is a poem that was written at the height of the apartheid regimes’ madness. It isn’t angry in the sense of “shafting” anger but it is quite an indictment of apartheid and those who implemented it.  I would say it is a very deep indictment.

 

Shadows of a sun-darkened land” was published in 1984. “Wisdom in a jug - reflections of love” was published in 1999 - 15 years later.  It is a completely different type of a book - a book of love – a book of healing.

 

 

11. What is the underlying meaning in the poem the bread I eat is crusted? A critic referred to it as obscure.

 

 

The bread i eat is crusted was written at a time of spiritual crisis, at the time of the worst of apartheid where people were being denied a livelihood and life itself.  Everything was so painful in the whole world around me for all my fellow human beings that the fact that I could actually still eat a piece of bread made me feel incredibly guilty. I felt bad, I felt I shouldn’t eat because I thought of people who couldn’t eat and therefore the bread that was in my hand became crusted, became hard – it started to taste of a labourers sweat, because people all over the country were dying, were labouring away, were doing things so others could survive yet were not able to survive themselves and I almost felt then that in eating a slice of bread I was eating the flesh of those who had laboured in its production.

 

 

The felt politics of your daily life at the time of writing Echoes of my other self are accurately expressed in the poem:

 

 

the border

is as far  

as the black man

who walks alongside you

                 

as secure

as your door

against the unwanted knock

 

Do your poems stem from personal experiences? Are they autobiographical?

 

I’ll tell you a little bit more about the border that not too many people know. The border had another stanza at the end, which was cut off because we were very afraid of the security police and the fact that one of my poems had been banned before, the poem for Fatima Meer. That poem initially entitled For Fatima Meer and published as such in a magazine was found to be a threat to the security of the state or something silly like that and I published it again in the collection.  But I took out the “Meer” in the title as a precaution!

 

The border read at the end

 

as comforting

as timol’s death

in vorster square

 

We thought that it would be too provocative to include that last stanza and therefore the Border was published without this stanza, but it worked very well because I know that the Border has been quoted very often - even in other people’s writings.

 

 

Shadows of a sun-darkened land

 

 

1.     You did deal with the political and social problems of South Africa.  But, in a different vein to the protest poets of the 80’s. Any reasons for the aloofness from the Staffrider poets?

 

 

I don’t think that I ever looked at the writings of others and decided that I would remain aloof in any way. All I ever wanted to do was to write good poetry - that’s all I have ever wanted to do - Douglas said a good poet was one who had been dead for a hundred years and one of his works was still read  - I took the act of writing very seriously, considered it a privilege and a gift to write – and wanted one day to be known as a good poet.

 

I think I always wrote more from my inner self - tried to understand my own inner self, the inner selves of others, the manifestations of the state’s inner self - so if the country was in trouble it meant that its people were in trouble – they were troubled human beings, they lacked knowledge or understanding or generosity or they were full of fear – something affected them. In my writing I have leaned towards going into the heart of something and seeing it for what it is and therefore even in my political writing I looked at the problems of society, not at the superficial level of the problem itself but at the inner structural problem within the hearts of human beings that resulted in oppression, unjustness, cruelty, forgetting the humanity of others and forgetting one’s own humanity. There are many, many political poems in my work – but they nearly always delve into something deeper that I questioned or probed which allowed them to survive the protest and survive as poems – one of which I hope will still be read a hundred years after I am dead.

 

 

15. You articulate very eloquently your unique kind of protest poetry in Shadows of a sun-darkened land as:  I had attempted and I felt succeeded, in "changing" the art of writing protest poetry by incorporating protest in personal poetry in order to give the poetry a life that would outlast the protest. Or in order to give the protest a life that would remain as long as poetry is written.

     Would you like to comment on your unique protest strategy?

  

 

I think I said two things – there was a part of me that leant towards the understanding of the deeper self – that obviously helped me to do what I subsequently did. It was “deliberate” in that in discussions that I had with Douglas we talked about the political poetry of the day which he felt wouldn’t survive and he encouraged me to write about things that would survive but I didn’t just want to write only about the things that would survive and ignore the political turmoil which I knew wouldn’t survive - and it’s good that it didn’t survive. It wasn’t just a question of only writing about the sun, the earth and the moon, as these will survive for thousands and thousands of years!  Having the inner leanings which I had – my natural leanings combined with Douglas’s understanding of poetry and what made poetry survive – it was very easy for me to do what my heart cried out to do which was to cry out against the political problems and oppression of the day but do it in a way that came naturally to me and which fulfilled I hope Douglas’ criteria of a good poem and to get the best of both these worlds.

 

 

16. Critics often distinguished between those writers who linked their works with political activism and those that wrote about themes other than protest. Do you see poets that did not write against apartheid as having had a different constituency?

 

 

I very rarely judge other people and if someone didn’t write about apartheid then he or she didn’t and here I think that my understanding of spirituality and God and goodness and the fact that oppression basically is never sustainable and can never survive, helped me – it doesn’t really matter who opposes oppression and who does not. The oppressor has no hope of survival and if someone does not fight it there are others who always will-in a sense if an individual chooses not do he simply loses the benefit for himself of nothing having done so - I don’t look upon such persons and judge them as having failed society – I think that they failed themselves.

 

 

17. How did you handle the tension between politics and aesthetics in your writings?

 

 

I think that one third of my poetry is actually political poetry. There is very little I do whether consciously or sub-consciously where I do not apply the mind as well as the heart. In choosing poems for both Echoes and shadows, there we kept this balance within the collection – a balance, which I hope, exists in myself.

 

 

18. Many of your poems deal with personal relationships e.g. in my poemless year. How did your personal relationships influence your poetry?

 

 

I think it is a great thing to be in love and to look around and see beauty because in both you are actually seeing the divine - nothing other that - that’s really what its all about - so all exposure to beauty and to love brought me close not only the person I loved but also I hope, to the divine.

 

 

 19. Would you comment on the fact that you remain essentially optimistic in your poems? E.g.

 

not the yielding of seed to soil

nor even the delivering of life from seed

is certain

but jerusalem shall be free

 

There is actually no alternative for a human being but to be optimistic because life is such a powerful force - it is a force that you can use to shape things around you and much of your ability to be transformational depends on how you are within yourself - I hope that it reflects my own sense of trust in God and in goodness and that goodness does prevail, life does prevail.

 

 

31. You mentioned in your bio-details that protest must live as long as the poetry. Does that explain poems like they call you mister steve biko now you’re dead, the rain probes with a million eyes and death stalks the innocent and non-innocent?

 

 

Both the Biko and the Imam Haroon poem are poems that can and should live forever because they in a sense give life and celebrate the life of those who could not do so physically - people who contributed to our freedom and to whom we owe a great deal.

 

 

31. What is the relevance of the three components sea, sky and land in inward moon outward sun?

 

The headings are simply a way of differentiating between poems dealing with different subject matter. I looked for a way of separating them so that the collection would read better. I decided to use sea, sky and land because they kind of flow into each other. Land is easy because it really relates to poems that deal very largely with issues of the land and other social and political issues. The sea and sky poems deal mainly with the spirit and love – in a different context – though even the political poems are spiritual or love poems.

 

I didn’t do this in the first two books. One of the people who suggested this to me was Steven Watson. When I started to plan a new book I had what I considered a quorum of poems that could make a complete volume. But because I had not published over the past 15 years I looked for people who would read the poems and critique them for me, because I had grown rusty in many ways and I obviously still wanted to remain a  “good” writer. I wanted to be sure I was still writing poetry that was worth publishing, and Douglas wasn’t around and Mike wasn’t around so I looked for friends who would do this for me and basically assist me. I turned to Eve Horwitz who had done a review of Shadows of the Sun-Darkened Land many, many years ago and Eve gave me her thoughts on what I had written, and Stephen Watson was incredibly helpful - as well as Helen Moffett, Michael Green, Mike Chapman, Patrick Cullinan and many others. I really needed that help after all those years and I absorbed the criticism of the people from whom I’d asked for this response - I worked on the poems again; I left out many that did not work and finally came up with a collection which I hope will prove very good.

 

 

Conclusion

 

 

32. How would you describe your style of writing?

 

 

To me two things are absolutely essential for a poem to be called a poem and that is unique imagery and good rhythm - those are fundamental elements in a good poem. Obviously there is a great deal more than that. If you ask about things that are unique to me, these would be an ability to get to the essence of things, to crystallize this essence, and to write   poems dealing with almost nothing more than this crystallized essence. 

 

 

33. Are you essentially a lyric poet?

 

 

Very much so.

 

 

34. When you work on poems, do you look for something to link them to make a collection?

 

 

 I think that the link comes much, much later. When you write a poem, you write that poem - you don’t have a collection in mind at the time of writing. You never actually know if you are ever going to publish another collection in your life - the link actually comes later.

 

 

35. Which is your favourite collection and why?

 

 

There are two published works – Shadows and Echoes. That’s really the only comparison that I can make. Of the two I would think Shadows of the Sun-darkened Land is probably the stronger collection, but there are many poems in Echoes of my other self which I like a great deal as well.

 

 

36. Did you forge any links with other South African Indian poets or writers?

 

 

Links, I have - but not intimate links, they’re warm links and I consider many of the writers my friends. But I do not have that kind of link where I associate regularly with others or contact others regularly. When I was in Durban, I had closer links with some people but since I’ve come to Cape Town my work has been extremely demanding and I have also not sought this kind of close link.

 

 

37. How have the critics received your poetry? Has this informed your subsequent writings?

 

 

This becomes really subjective - I think that my work has been exceptionally well received. Most of the reviews I have read reflect a healthy appreciation of the writing. Obviously there have been reviews –that have not been favourable, but that again is to be expected. It would be surprising if everybody thought it was good. I just hope I don’t get to a time when everybody thinks it’s bad!

 

 

38. Whom do you envisage as your audience?

 

 

I hope that in the future it will be everyone who reads, who cares, who feels, who loves – everybody.

 

 

39. What have you been reading recently?

 

 

My recent readings are mainly books on spirituality and books on love. I enjoy reading Rumi, a very famous spiritual poet and other works on spirituality. Many of these authors I read are human beings with a profound understanding of life and creation, themselves and the human heart.

 

 

40. What message do you have for your readers out there?

 

 

 I think for anybody who reads poetry – whether it is my work or anybody else’s work – it is important to find poetry they can enjoy.

 

 

41. Tell me something of Inward Moon, your new book due to be published by the University of Natal next year.

 

 

I think it was very important to get Inward Moon published – because it has some very good poems in it and also because it closes a chapter of my life. Whether I will write again quite like how I have written in the past, I don’t know. We will have to wait for time to show where my writing is headed.

 

 

●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●●

 

 

An Interview with Shabbir Banoobhai

by Bijuraj Kochi, Kerala, India

 

 

As a reader (from some distance) I find that your poems are deeply rooted in Sufism. Do you agree with this observation?

 

 

Before I respond to this question, Bijuraj, let me first thank you most sincerely for caring to read my work and for finding out more about it. Most people who read my work make the same observation about it that you have just made. Therefore there must be some truth in it.  Personally I never consider my writing as being rooted in Sufism, though in some way it might be. The reason for my reluctance to do so is that I do not consider myself worthy of being considered in the same company as those who have true closeness to the divine. My own love for the divine is still weak and fallible. I see myself simply as a very fortunate human being with a gift for understanding the spiritual, but my own spiritual development has far to go!

 

 

Again, as a reader, I found your writing has a soft touch. Or perhaps I should say you are a writer who speaks to the heart with the heart. Is this an influence of your religious outlook? Whether it is or not, what is your philosophy and religious outlook?

 

 

I suppose since the over-riding theme of my writing is love (the essence of every spiritual belief), it is understandable that you would make such a comment. I once wrote that the journey of love is a “journey of the heart, in the heart, from the heart to the heart”. My formal religious belief is Islamic – I am a Muslim – and I try to be a good one – but my understanding, not only of Islam but of all religions, is that their source is one and their goal is the same - to help us see the divine everywhere (both within and outside us); to love the divine always; to be compassionate towards all; and to serve all of creation - men, women, children, animals and trees.

 

 

References to Love and God are often present in your poems. Can a writer change social thinking? Or have the ability to lead social change towards God and Love. Where would you want society to move in this respect?

 

 

I have already commented on the place of love and the divine in my life and in my writing. A writer can certainly cause social change. How effectively depends on the visibility his or her writing is given. Initially when this visibility is low the impact the writer makes is generally limited to a small circle of readers. But given time (and the building of a critical mass of writing) it is possible to influence many people, especially in this technological age. This is the reason why so many writers have their own websites. You have, I know, seen my own website: www.veilsoflight.com

 

As for where I would like to see society moving, I would like to see greater understanding amongst communities and nations.  But this can only happen if there is meaningful communication based on respect for one another; so it is essential that we make the effort to know others and their deepest values and furthermore have the humility to learn from the values and wisdom of others.   

 

  

What is your attitude towards poetry? How much can you expose of yourself in it? What is writing for you?

 

 

I love poetry because it is such a wonderful combination of art and music. In any art that expresses deep truths, the writer often bares his own intimate self to others. In such instances the language the writer uses itself reflects the state of his or her soul. This may, indeed, apply not only to writers but to all of us. There is always risk associated with every kind of communication but writers (knowingly or unknowingly) often both reveal and conceal simultaneously – the deepest and most sensitive things are effectively only revealed to the most sensitive reader – this itself affords the writer some protection as the sensitive reader has a spiritual kinship with the writer – while the less sensitive reader effectively only accesses that part of what the writer is saying that the writer is comfortable sharing with someone with such  sensitivity.

 

 

What about South African literature? What are the new trends? How do you compare South African literature to international literature?

 

 

South African literature is currently flourishing at every level; both old and new writers are writing new stories; many of the new black writers are telling the stories of their lives and the history of their communities. And most other writers are also finding something new to say. Some writers are still searching for something as powerful to write about as apartheid - the system that has just been dismantled; some of the new writing celebrates our new freedom, some of the new writing is critical of the new elite for forgetting the less fortunate too soon. A South African writer J.M. Coetzee recently won the Nobel Prize for literature so South African writing is taking its rightful place internationally.

 

 

You said that you have good friendship with the great writer Fatima Meer. Say something more about that. How did she look at your writings? And the influence she or other writers have had on your own writing.

 

 

Fatima Meer has always been a great South African activist, writing about and speaking tirelessly against oppression in all its forms – both against apartheid and the global oppression of the rich against the poor. Just recently she has been campaigning for the cancellation of Africa’s monetary debt to mainly Western countries. I first met her when I was a student leader at the college where I trained to become a teacher – I later became an accountant. She introduced me to South Africa’s best poet at the time – Douglas Livingstone – who became my poetry mentor and ultimately a precious poet-friend. Others who helped me in my early days include a lecturer of English at a University in Natal, Durban, Mike Kirkwood, who later left the University to become a publisher. His company, Ravan Press, published my first book of poetry. I have since had a further five books published.  

 

 

While studying in college you were a revolutionary. What were your political beliefs? Have you changed your political views thereafter? 

 

 

My political beliefs mirror my spiritual beliefs. I believe that we are all essentially divine. I believe therefore that we should not discriminate against people because of their race, religion or gender. I believe moreover that we have a duty to be compassionate towards every living creature and a duty to take care of others. I believe that God has given us the earth to live on as a trust that we have to respect and protect; and the earth’s resources are not to be abused or used selfishly. My political beliefs have not changed over the years because these spiritual beliefs have never wavered. 

 

 

South Africa was known as a land of racism. What is the current position there? Does racism still exist? How much Black Consciousness is there now?  Can you say more about that movement?

 

 

Racism, thankfully, is no longer promoted legally – and consequently racism has decreased considerably since we gained our freedom in the first democratic elections of 1994. However racism has not been completely eradicated. This will take at least a generation as the older generation still lapses into racist practices from time to time. However we in South Africa are very fortunate as we have been dealing with our differences for centuries and there is a strong desire for the new South Africa to succeed; and there is great pride in South Africa’s new constitution which protects individual and group rights better than do many countries in the Western world.

 

The black consciousness movement arose during the era of apartheid when it was necessary to uplift the spirit of, and offer hope to, Black people who were almost regarded as non-people in many ways. The Black consciousness movement (and especially its most charismatic leader Steve Biko, who was ultimately murdered by the security police of the apartheid era, made Black people proud of their blackness and mobilised Black people to rise against the apartheid regime. Of course all South Africans are now equal before the law so Black Consciousness is not needed as a mass movement any longer. The pride of all South Africans now mostly comes from being South African and no longer from being black, white or brown.  

 

 

Black power in South Africa is being seen as rotten as the power earlier. For example there have been many allegations against Winnie Mandela. How do you react to this?

 

 

Abuse of power is inevitable wherever people exercise power. But this abuse is presently concentrated around specific individuals (sometimes well-known and in high places!) but it is nothing like the systematic abuse of power practised by the apartheid state and backed by its military might. Of course all abuse has to be exposed ad stopped.

 

 

Recently there have been many attacks against and a great deal of criticism towards Islam. What do you have to say about religious fundamentalism? Is that also happening in South Africa? How do people react to this?

 

 

Religious fundamentalism whether espoused by Muslims, or by any other person of any other faith is ultimately destructive – not only does it adversely affect the image of that religion but unfortunately taints its adherents as a whole; and yet these adherents on the whole may be as good as (or better than) than their counterparts belonging to other faiths. Negative publicity is understandable if anyone commits an atrocity in the name of his or her religion; but not understandable where the publicity is relentlessly negative towards an entire community based on the misguided actions of a few of its adherents. When this happens it calls into question the bona fide nature of the criticism.

 

Presently Muslims in South Africa do not have to contend the same kind of negative perceptions of Muslims or Islam affecting Muslims in mainly Western countries. South African Muslims, like people of all faiths, contributed to the downfall of apartheid. People of faiths are treated equally before the law. South African are relatively well educated and this lessens emotional responses to problems relating to religious differences. Within the Muslim community there are many strong activists who respond strongly but peacefully to unfair criticism. South African society has learnt to encourage and protect the right of all its members to protest peacefully against unfairness and injustice. South Africans have been living with their differences for hundreds of years unlike the citizens of European countries facing waves of new immigrants they have not learnt to relate to; so South Africans no longer feel threatened by some of the minor issues that trouble the West – such as schoolgirls wearing Hijab or scarves! 

 

 

From the news we hear that an anti-imperialist struggle is emerging in different parts of South Africa. Is this correct? What is the position of mass struggle?

 

 

South African activists are starting to intensify the struggle against imperialism, global exploitation, and Aids. It is interesting to note that even the South African government supports a number of causes that Western countries and many white South Africans still find difficulty accepting – such as support for the Palestinians - though many Muslims feel the South African government is still not doing enough. However South Africa’s quiet diplomacy regarding Zimbabwe is causing concern to many people who feel South Africa should be taking a tougher stance against Robert Mugabe’s government. The public activism cannot yet, though, be regarded as mass struggle in the same way as the mass struggle that developed against apartheid.

 

 

Gandhiji fought against racism in Durban; you were born there. How do you connect to this? What do you have to say about Gandhi’s thought?

 

 

I am very proud to have been born and to have lived in Durban, the place where Gandhiji first encountered and resisted oppression. I hold Gandhiji's thoughts and values in high esteem and try to live up to many of his thoughts and ideals.

 

 

You are a person of Indian origin. How do you look at that? How much has Indian culture influenced you? How much are you keeping your connection with the Indian social system?

 

 

I am also proud of my Indian heritage. Our broader family’s culture is still very Indian in many ways. The food we eat, the clothes we wear, the language we speak to our elders are all strongly influenced by our Indian heritage. We keep in touch with events in India by reading and following the news. Naturally we listen to Indian music and watch Indian movies, which have a strong following in South Africa!

 

 

What about Indian Literature? Are you familiar with Malayalam Literature?

 

 

I love reading novels and other literary work by Indian authors and in fact look for books by Indian authors almost every time I go to a bookshop. I have read books by many Indian authors – too many to mention individually. Unfortunately I am not familiar with Malayalam literature.

 

 

Professionally you are a commerce person. That field is entirely different and far away from literature. How do you keep writing?

 

 

The fields are different, yes. I am a writer at heart. My profession has been learnt. But I manage to live with the two quite easily. And enjoy them both. 

 

 

Have you any plan to visit India again? What were your feelings when you were here?

 

 

I have visited India only once, in 1980. I loved it. At that time my uncle (my father’s brother) was still alive. He has since passed away. But I would like to visit his family again. When my wife and I were in Delhi on our last visit, one of our abiding memories was meeting India’s Prime Minister, Mrs Indira Gandhi. I had just had my first book published and decided I would like to present her with a copy. She was not in her office so we were directed to her home. When I explained to her staff who we were and what I wanted to do (present her with a copy of my book) they went to ask her if she would meet us and she did! So my book gained me a meeting with India’s Prime Minister. I think it is almost impossible, considering the security-conscious world we are living in today, that something like this can ever happen again!